bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks


From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: Re: [ PATCH ] Replace glibc spin-locks with gsync-based locks
Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 00:42:49 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.21+34 (58baf7c9f32f) (2010-12-30)

Agustina Arzille, on Fri 06 May 2016 23:19:20 -0300, wrote:
> I run it with "kvm -m 512 -hda debian-hurd-20160325.img", because I had heard
> mixed things about writeback cache. I'll try a build again with that option.

512M is not so much, perhaps use more as Richard suggested.

> >>+/* Gsync flags. */
> >>+#define GSYNC_SHARED      0x01
> >>+#define GSYNC_QUAD        0x02
> >>+#define GSYNC_TIMED       0x04
> >>+#define GSYNC_BROADCAST   0x08
> >>+#define GSYNC_MUTATE      0x10
> >Don't we install a mach header to define these?  If not yet, we really
> >should.
> 
> Well, in mach/gnumach.h, there's only the prototypes.

I mean perhaps installing gsync.h into mach/gsync.h, like other such
headers.

Samuel



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]