[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by s
From: |
Svante Signell |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack |
Date: |
Mon, 28 Jan 2019 20:47:13 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Evolution 3.30.4-1 |
On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 20:27 +0100, Svante Signell wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 20:24 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > Svante Signell, le lun. 28 janv. 2019 20:23:38 +0100, a ecrit:
> > > On Mon, 2019-01-28 at 20:18 +0100, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> > > > It's odd to have this all to 0... Do you have a backtrace to have an
> > > > idea how we end up here?
> > >
> > > See next email.
> >
> > A backtrace would still be useful :)
You have it. Anything else?
When running repeated tests some of them fail at different points for each run.
Seems a little random to me. Is something not initialized properly except when
being called the first time?
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, (continued)
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/26
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack,
Svante Signell <=
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Samuel Thibault, 2019/01/28
- Re: [Bug hurd/24110] SS_DISABLE never set in stack_t value returned by sigaltstack, Svante Signell, 2019/01/28