[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration OFF TOPIC PRAI
From: |
Amos Jeffries |
Subject: |
Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration OFF TOPIC PRAISE |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Aug 2020 00:19:01 +1200 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.11.0 |
On 11/08/20 11:57 pm, Samuel Thibault wrote:
> Almudena Garcia, le mar. 11 août 2020 13:45:19 +0200, a ecrit:
>>> P.S. You might be interested in using the program git send-email.
>>> Apparently it makes it really easy to send in a patches series. It's
>>> actually what GNU Guix contributing guidelines recommends.
>> My problem is that, in my internal repository, I do many commits for each
>> change (even for each file). The development is progressive.
>> Then, if I take the commit history to generate my patches, I would generate
>> many spurious patches, making it very difficult to check and apply them.
>
> Sure, that's a common thing when developping.
>
>> Even doing a rebase over another branch, the rebase adds the commit history,
>> so
>> I keep the same problem.
>
> ? On the contrary, rebase lets you decide what exactly you keep in the
> history and what you squash.
>
Almundena:
To clarify in case you are not aware. The "rebase -i" operation is what
is being suggested. The -i option enables much more flexibility of
control over the patch sequence and history during rebase.
HTH
Amos
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration, (continued)
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration, Almudena Garcia, 2020/08/10
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration, Jessica Clarke, 2020/08/10
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration, Almudena Garcia, 2020/08/10
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration OFF TOPIC PRAISE, Joshua Branson, 2020/08/11
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration OFF TOPIC PRAISE, Almudena Garcia, 2020/08/11
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration OFF TOPIC PRAISE, Samuel Thibault, 2020/08/11
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration OFF TOPIC PRAISE, Almudena Garcia, 2020/08/11
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration OFF TOPIC PRAISE, Amos Jeffries, 2020/08/11
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration OFF TOPIC PRAISE, Almudena Garcia, 2020/08/11
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration OFF TOPIC PRAISE, Samuel Thibault, 2020/08/11
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration OFF TOPIC PRAISE,
Amos Jeffries <=
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration OFF TOPIC PRAISE, Joshua Branson, 2020/08/12
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration, Almudena Garcia, 2020/08/11
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration, Almudena Garcia, 2020/08/11
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration, Almudena Garcia, 2020/08/11
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration, Almudena Garcia, 2020/08/12
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration, Samuel Thibault, 2020/08/12
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration, Samuel Thibault, 2020/08/12
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration, Almudena Garcia, 2020/08/12
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration, Samuel Thibault, 2020/08/12
- Re: [PATCH] SMP initialization: detection and enumeration, Almudena Garcia, 2020/08/13