bug-hurd
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] remove pth issue


From: Samuel Thibault
Subject: Re: [PATCH] remove pth issue
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 22:22:13 +0200
User-agent: NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3)

Applied, thanks!

Guy-Fleury Iteriteka, le lun. 30 mai 2022 22:01:05 +0200, a ecrit:
> ---
>  open_issues/pth.mdwn | 28 ----------------------------
>  1 file changed, 28 deletions(-)
>  delete mode 100644 open_issues/pth.mdwn
> 
> diff --git a/open_issues/pth.mdwn b/open_issues/pth.mdwn
> deleted file mode 100644
> index 12bf509..0000000
> --- a/open_issues/pth.mdwn
> +++ /dev/null
> @@ -1,28 +0,0 @@
> -[[!meta copyright="Copyright © 2008, 2009, 2010 Free Software Foundation,
> -Inc."]]
> -
> -[[!meta license="""[[!toggle id="license" text="GFDL 1.2+"]][[!toggleable
> -id="license" text="Permission is granted to copy, distribute and/or modify 
> this
> -document under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 
> or
> -any later version published by the Free Software Foundation; with no 
> Invariant
> -Sections, no Front-Cover Texts, and no Back-Cover Texts.  A copy of the 
> license
> -is included in the section entitled
> -[[GNU Free Documentation License|/fdl]]."]]"""]]
> -
> -[[!tag open_issue_porting]]
> -
> -IRC, unknown channel, unknown date.
> -
> -    <azeem> seems pth still doesn't work
> -    <bddebian> Doesn't build or doesn't work?
> -    <azeem> both
> -    <azeem> some configure test keep grinding the CPU, same for the test 
> suite
> -    <azeem> which apparently runs pth_init() and never returns
> -
> -    <azeem> actually, pth fails to build right now
> -    <azeem> pth_mctx.c:477: error: request for member '__pc' in something 
> not a structure or union
> -
> -    <azeem> I know the pth test suite fails (it locks up the machine) or 
> used to fail, so I guess porting work for pth would be needed
> -    <azeem> < marcusb> from reading the pth/PORTING document, porting libpth 
> shouldn't be too hard...
> -
> -    <youpi> dropped pth [from the channel's topic], as we think we know why 
> it fails (sigaltstack is bogus)
> -- 
> 2.30.2
> 
> 

-- 
Samuel
---
Pour une évaluation indépendante, transparente et rigoureuse !
Je soutiens la Commission d'Évaluation de l'Inria.



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]