[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: bug#58320: Hurd VM fails to boot on AMD EPYC (kvm-amd)
From: |
Ludovic Courtès |
Subject: |
Re: bug#58320: Hurd VM fails to boot on AMD EPYC (kvm-amd) |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Oct 2022 17:52:11 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.1 (gnu/linux) |
Hi Samuel,
Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org> skribis:
> About the backtrace:
>
>>>>>> user space <<<<<
> 0x1000(bfffff24,0,0,1160b,0)
> 0x11627(bfffff9c,0,0,0,2)
> 0x11bb()
>
> That is quite surprising actually: in my ld.so there is nothing useful
> at 0x1000. Perhaps you can check what 0x11627 is all about?
Sure:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ addr2line -e
/gnu/store/m8afvcgwmrfhvjpd7b0xllk8vv5isd6j-glibc-cross-i586-pc-gnu-2.33/lib/ld.so.1
0x1000 0x11627 0x11bb
??:0
/tmp/guix-build-glibc-cross-i586-pc-gnu-2.33.drv-0/glibc-2.33/elf/dl-misc.c:333
:?
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
That’s ‘_dl_fatal_printf’ calling ‘_exit’; it’s trying to tell us
something.
I’ll try and rebuild the system with the debugging patches at
<https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-hurd/2011-11/msg00038.html>, to
get early ld.so output, for lack of a better solution…
>> Program Header:
>> LOAD off 0x00000000 vaddr 0x00000000 paddr 0x00000000 align 2**12
>> filesz 0x00000dd8 memsz 0x00000dd8 flags r--
>
> We don't have this section in the Debian glibc. It'd probably be useful
> to know what this is about.
Address 0 is for the ‘_begin’ symbol, passed by -Wl,-defsym:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
i586-pc-gnu-gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles -r -o
/tmp/guix-build-glibc-cross-i586-pc-gnu-2.33.drv-0/build/elf/librtld.os
'-Wl,-('
/tmp/guix-build-glibc-cross-i586-pc-gnu-2.33.drv-0/build/elf/dl-allobjs.os
/tmp/guix-build-glibc-cross-i586-pc-gnu-2.33.drv-0/build/elf/rtld-libc.a -lgcc
'-Wl,-)' \
-Wl,-Map,/tmp/guix-build-glibc-cross-i586-pc-gnu-2.33.drv-0/build/elf/librtld.os.map
i586-pc-gnu-gcc -nostdlib -nostartfiles -shared -o
/tmp/guix-build-glibc-cross-i586-pc-gnu-2.33.drv-0/build/elf/ld.so.new
\
-Wl,-z,combreloc -Wl,-z,relro -Wl,--hash-style=both -Wl,-z,defs
\
/tmp/guix-build-glibc-cross-i586-pc-gnu-2.33.drv-0/build/elf/librtld.os
-Wl,--version-script=/tmp/guix-build-glibc-cross-i586-pc-gnu-2.33.drv-0/build/ld.map
\
-Wl,-soname=ld.so.1 \
-Wl,-defsym=_begin=0
i586-pc-gnu-readelf -s
/tmp/guix-build-glibc-cross-i586-pc-gnu-2.33.drv-0/build/elf/ld.so.new \
| gawk '($7 ~ /^UND(|EF)$/ && $1 != "0:" && $4 != "REGISTER") { print; p=1 }
END { exit p != 0 }'
mv -f /tmp/guix-build-glibc-cross-i586-pc-gnu-2.33.drv-0/build/elf/ld.so.new
/tmp/guix-build-glibc-cross-i586-pc-gnu-2.33.drv-0/build/elf/ld.so
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
And indeed:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
$ objdump -t
/gnu/store/m8afvcgwmrfhvjpd7b0xllk8vv5isd6j-glibc-cross-i586-pc-gnu-2.33/lib/ld.so.1|grep
_begin
00000000 l *ABS* 00000000 _begin
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
That ‘-Wl,-defsym=_begin=0’ flag was removed in glibc commit
6f043e0ee7e477f50a44024ed0cb579d5e3f511d (April 2022).
On darnassus it’s different but then it’s Debian’s glibc 2.35, natively
built, so I don’t what conclusions can be drawn:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
ludo@darnassus:~$ /lib/ld.so.1 --version
ld.so (Debian GLIBC 2.35-1) stable release version 2.35.
Copyright (C) 2022 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
This is free software; see the source for copying conditions.
There is NO warranty; not even for MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
ludo@darnassus:~$ objdump -x /lib/ld.so.1 |head -40
/lib/ld.so.1: file format elf32-i386
/lib/ld.so.1
architecture: i386, flags 0x00000150:
HAS_SYMS, DYNAMIC, D_PAGED
start address 0x0001cc40
Program Header:
LOAD off 0x00000000 vaddr 0x00000000 paddr 0x00000000 align 2**12
filesz 0x00038494 memsz 0x00038494 flags r-x
LOAD off 0x00038c00 vaddr 0x00039c00 paddr 0x00039c00 align 2**12
filesz 0x00001ca8 memsz 0x00001e34 flags rw-
DYNAMIC off 0x00039f24 vaddr 0x0003af24 paddr 0x0003af24 align 2**2
filesz 0x000000b8 memsz 0x000000b8 flags rw-
NOTE off 0x00000114 vaddr 0x00000114 paddr 0x00000114 align 2**2
filesz 0x00000024 memsz 0x00000024 flags r--
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Thanks for your feedback!
Ludo’.
- bug#58320: Hurd VM fails to boot on AMD EPYC (kvm-amd), Ludovic Courtès, 2022/10/05
- Re: bug#58320: Hurd VM fails to boot on AMD EPYC (kvm-amd), Ludovic Courtès, 2022/10/06
- Re: bug#58320: Hurd VM fails to boot on AMD EPYC (kvm-amd), Samuel Thibault, 2022/10/06
- Re: bug#58320: Hurd VM fails to boot on AMD EPYC (kvm-amd), Ludovic Courtès, 2022/10/06
- Re: bug#58320: Hurd VM fails to boot on AMD EPYC (kvm-amd), Samuel Thibault, 2022/10/06
- Re: bug#58320: Hurd VM fails to boot on AMD EPYC (kvm-amd), Ludovic Courtès, 2022/10/07
- Re: bug#58320: Hurd VM fails to boot on AMD EPYC (kvm-amd), Samuel Thibault, 2022/10/07
- Re: bug#58320: Hurd VM fails to boot on AMD EPYC (kvm-amd),
Ludovic Courtès <=
- Re: bug#58320: Hurd VM fails to boot on AMD EPYC (kvm-amd), Ludovic Courtès, 2022/10/09
- Re: bug#58320: Hurd VM fails to boot on AMD EPYC (kvm-amd), Samuel Thibault, 2022/10/09
- Re: bug#58320: Hurd VM fails to boot on AMD EPYC (kvm-amd), Ludovic Courtès, 2022/10/10
- Re: bug#58320: Hurd VM fails to boot on AMD EPYC (kvm-amd), Ludovic Courtès, 2022/10/17
- Re: bug#58320: Hurd VM fails to boot on AMD EPYC (kvm-amd), Ludovic Courtès, 2022/10/23