Re: [PATCH] Use $(CC) instead of gcc to avoid relying on the host gcc.

[Sergey Bugaev]

A humble meta-suggestion, if I might:

it would be nicer if you explicitly specified what source tree this
patch is for, for instance: [PATCH glibc] or [PATCH gnumach] instead
of just [PATCH]. (There is the --subject-prefix option in git
format-patch for this.)

This is typically easy to infer by looking at the file paths, e.g.
sysdeps/htl clearly points at glibc, kern/task.c is naturally GNU
Mach, rumpdisk/main.c is of course the Hurd proper. But just
Makefile.am — I don't know what this is. Is this GNU Mach, GNU MIG,
glibc, the Hurd, something else? (Actually, looking at the actual
patch, this seems to be GNU Mach.)

Thanks for your work!

Sergey