[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 64bit startup
From: |
Samuel Thibault |
Subject: |
Re: 64bit startup |
Date: |
Sun, 4 Jun 2023 19:21:02 +0200 |
User-agent: |
NeoMutt/20170609 (1.8.3) |
Hello,
Sergey Bugaev, le sam. 03 juin 2023 20:20:24 +0300, a ecrit:
> I'm attaching a patch that does that and also documents the pitfalls
> (and also removes an extra block scope / level of indentation). It's
> untested, but it builds and the generated code looks OK (sc_reply_port
> gets loaded straight into %rdx, to be passed into __sigreturn2). Please
> test!
It seems to be working fine indeed, I have applied it, thanks!
> The stack guard issue must be caused by something else.
It seems so indeed. But it's not only the stack guard, but various TLS
accesses.
Samuel
- Re: 64bit startup, Sergey Bugaev, 2023/06/03
- Re: 64bit startup,
Samuel Thibault <=
- Re: 64bit startup, Sergey Bugaev, 2023/06/04
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/06/04
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/06/05
- Re: 64bit startup, Sergey Bugaev, 2023/06/05
- Re: 64bit startup, Sergey Bugaev, 2023/06/06
- Re: 64bit startup, Luca, 2023/06/06
- Re: 64bit startup, Sergey Bugaev, 2023/06/06
- fsbase getting clobbered (was: Re: 64bit startup), Sergey Bugaev, 2023/06/09
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/06/06
- Re: 64bit startup, Sergey Bugaev, 2023/06/09