[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: 64bit startup
From: |
Sergey Bugaev |
Subject: |
Re: 64bit startup |
Date: |
Wed, 25 Oct 2023 16:29:29 +0300 |
On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 2:52 PM <jbranso@dismail.de> wrote:
>
> October 25, 2023 3:43 AM, "Samuel Thibault" <samuel.thibault@gnu.org> wrote:
>
> > jbranso@dismail.de, le mer. 25 oct. 2023 03:40:16 +0000, a ecrit:
> >
> >> Or maybe GCC is partly at fault for the
> >> Hurd's X86_64 building troubles?
> >
> > It's not at all. Nor is libtool.
> >
> > I occasionally had issues in ./configure, too.
> >
> > You'll say that's "yeah, it's all about auto-crap". No.
> >
> > It's *very* most probably about bash, simply.
> >
> > Samuel
>
> Hmmm. I guess in the long-term then, the bash issues should be fixed.
>
> Could we change the default shell on X86_64 Debian Hurd in the meantime,
> as a temporary solution?
I would rather ask, would it not be possible to set up a continuous
build server (buildd? I know next to nothing about the Debian infra)
that itself runs on a more stable architecture (amd64, or hurd-i386)
and cross-compiles the packages?
Sergey
- Re: 64bit startup, (continued)
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/25
- Re: 64bit startup, jbranso, 2023/10/25
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/25
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/25
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/26
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/27
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/29
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/30
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/30
- Re: 64bit startup, Sergey Bugaev, 2023/10/31
- Re: 64bit startup,
Sergey Bugaev <=
- Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/25
Re: 64bit startup, Martin Steigerwald, 2023/10/25
Re: 64bit startup, Samuel Thibault, 2023/10/26