[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: check for max cmd line length
From: |
Gary V . Vaughan |
Subject: |
Re: check for max cmd line length |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Jun 2001 18:25:27 +0100 |
On Monday 25 June 2001 5:20 pm, Tim Van Holder wrote:
> > > Please don't check for this on the Hurd, (*-gnu*), but just set it
> > > to any maximum value you need.
> >
> > Hmm.. I can't decide if this is good news or not. ;) I think what
> > needs to be done is to add some mechanism for telling Libtool
> > that there is no maximum. That would involve a check for Hurd
> > and setting a flag in configury, then in the libtool script
> > checks that skip the piecewise linking if the flag is set.
>
> That, or you could just set some high default in AC_LIBTOOL_SYS_MAX_CMD_LEN
> (say, 256K, as it seems fairly unlikely that would be hit often) the
> same way a default is now set for DJGPP (where the test would otherwise
> blow up the system).
I deliberately fiddled Tim's patch for DJGPP with the hurd problem in mind...
I was just waiting to find this thread again while working through the couple
of hundred I have marked for attention before 1.4b is released.
However, I don't want to blindly patch libtool if it a) masks a bug elsewhere
in libtool, b) masks a bug in the hurd.
Marcus, making this change in libtool is now a no-brainer, but we'll await
your verdict on whether this is the the Right Thing To Do, or whether it is a
bug elsewhere that you are seeing before we do anything else.
Cheers,
Gary.
--
())_. Gary V. Vaughan gary@(oranda.demon.co.uk|gnu.org)
( '/ Research Scientist http://www.oranda.demon.co.uk ,_())____
/ )= GNU Hacker http://www.gnu.org/software/libtool \' `&
`(_~)_ Tech' Author http://sources.redhat.com/autobook =`---d__/