[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug in LT 1.5 AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_CC_C_O
From: |
Bob Friesenhahn |
Subject: |
Re: Bug in LT 1.5 AC_LIBTOOL_PROG_CC_C_O |
Date: |
Wed, 7 Jan 2004 09:47:23 -0600 (CST) |
On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, Jeff Squyres wrote:
> So the issue is: does the compiler reliably support parallel builds in a
> single directory? Some points (in no particular order):
>
> - Testing for this behavior should probably be a new, standalone
> macro.
>
> - Given that Bob makes excellent points about generated temporary
> files in the cwd, how exactly would one test for whether a compiler
> exhibits this "bad" kind of behavior?
I don't believe the compiler's temp-file correctness can be tested via
a script. Observations in the compiler's verbose mode (if it has
one), watching system calls via truss, or even word of mouth, seem to
be the only semi-reliable way to verify that the compiler does what it
should.
Bob
======================================
Bob Friesenhahn
address@hidden
http://www.simplesystems.org/users/bfriesen