bug-libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

interix 3.5 and shared libraries


From: Matthew L Daniel
Subject: interix 3.5 and shared libraries
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:41:29 -0500
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.4i

My purpose is two-fold: 1. I would like to put this on the radar, since
no mention is made in any of the lists I could find 2. request input on
further steps I should take.

I have verified that gcc on Interix does, in fact, create shared
libraries but I am not sufficiently experienced with either libtool
architecture or m4 to be able to hack in the support for it myself.

Please see below for snippets from the configure script in
libtool-1.5.2.

  Thank you,
  -- /v\atthew

On Services for Unix 3.5 for Windows,
[uname -a]
Interix mdaniel 3.5 SP-8.0.1969.1 x86 Intel_x86_Family15_Model1_Stepping2

[/tmp/libtool-1.5.2/config.guess]
i586-pc-interix3

[gcc --version]
gcc (GCC) 3.3

[./configure --enable-shared --enable-static]
...
checking command to parse /bin/nm -B output from gcc object... ok
...
checking for gcc option to produce PIC... -fPIC
checking if gcc PIC flag -fPIC works... yes
checking if gcc supports -c -o file.o... yes
checking whether the gcc linker (/opt/gcc.3.3/i586-pc-interix3/bin/ld) supports 
shared libraries... no
checking dynamic linker characteristics... no
checking how to hardcode library paths into programs... immediate
checking whether stripping libraries is possible... yes
checking if libtool supports shared libraries... no
checking whether to build shared libraries... no
checking whether to build static libraries... yes
checking for dirent.h that defines DIR... yes
checking for library containing opendir... none required
checking which extension is used for loadable modules... .so
checking which variable specifies run-time library path...
checking for the default library search path... /lib /usr/lib
checking for objdir... .libs
checking whether libtool supports -dlopen/-dlpreopen... yes
checking for shl_load... no
checking for shl_load in -ldld... no
checking for dlopen in -ldl... yes
checking for dlerror... yes
...




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]