bug-libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: libtool: gentoo patch breaking on Debian amd64.


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: libtool: gentoo patch breaking on Debian amd64.
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 10:28:52 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11

Hi Kurt,

* Kurt Roeckx wrote on Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 02:36:07PM CET:
> On Wed, Dec 28, 2005 at 10:03:55AM +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> > 
> > Since I don't have a Debian amd64 system for testing, please rerun
> > the build, post the
> >   ./libtool --mode=link
> > command, and all of its output, with --debug added.  Please also post
> 
> /bin/sh ./libtool --mode=link --debug x86_64-linux-gnu-gcc -Wall  -Wall -g 
> -O2  -lsysfs -o libcpufreq.la -rpath /usr/lib -version-info 0:0:0  -lsysfs 
> cpufreq.lo sysfs.lo proc.lo
> 
> See libtool.debug attachment.
> 
> >   ./libtool --config
> 
> See libtool.config attachment.
> 
> I've also attached the /usr/lib/libsysfs.la file.

Thanks.

> Note that the shared library is installed in /lib, but the rest
> are in /usr/lib.

1) This is a bug, but not the one you reported.  It's not supported by
libtool to install the .la file in a different location than the actual
shared (or static) library.  Probably the easiest workaround would be to
not install the .la file at all in this case.  It may just happen to
work (in case all of the files end up in default-searched paths), but
it's not supported.

2) You are right in that the gentoo-specific patch hurts for Debian.

Does Debian amd64 have a symlink /lib64 -> /lib?  Without it I can't see
why it would get to the link line at all.

Cheers,
Ralf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]