Re: [libtool 2.1a] testsuite: 25 49 failed (cockpit error)

[Ralf Wildenhues]

* Lynn Ten Eyck wrote on Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 03:53:29PM CET:
> On Fri, 2007-02-16 at 14:11 +0100, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> 
> > The failure of 25 is new to me.  Do you have a libltdl.so.7 installed in
> > a place where the link editor finds it by default?  If yes, is there a
> > libltdl.la file installed alongside with it?  If not, why not, who
> > removed it?  It should be present.
> 
> This was a cockpit error.  I did ./configure && make && make install,
> which installed the new system in /usr/local/.  My path was set to pick
> up the new versions of the excutables, but the linker was not told where
> to find the libraries.

But that shouldn't be necessary.  If the libltdl.la file exists, then 
libtool should hard-code the path to the library into the ltdldemo
program.

> lynn> ls -l /usr/local/lib/libltd*
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 189678 Feb 15 21:55 /usr/local/lib/libltdl.a
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root    950 Feb 15 21:55 /usr/local/lib/libltdl.la*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     16 Feb 15 21:55 /usr/local/lib/libltdl.so -> 
> libltdl.so.7.0.0*
> lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     16 Feb 15 21:55 /usr/local/lib/libltdl.so.7 -> 
> libltdl.so.7.0.0*
> -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 113165 Feb 15 21:55 /usr/local/lib/libltdl.so.7.0.0*
> 
> /usr/local/lib64 is empty.
> 
> I re-ran the tests with the LD_LIBRARY_PATH set to explicitly include
> /usr/local/lib.  Test 25 passed, and test 49 gave the known failure. 
> If you would like the log, I can send it, but I doubt if there is any
> new information in it.  I turned on the -v flag for verbose output.

Yes, please do not set LD_LIBRARY_PATH, then run
  make check-local TESTSUITEFLAGS='-v -d -x 25'
  cd tests/testsuite.dir

and send tests/testsuite.dir/25/config.log.

Thanks,
Ralf