Re: Libtool fails to build working binary when -no-install is used

[Peter O'Gorman]

On Apr 3, 2007, at 4:44 PM, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:

> Hi Peter, all,
>
> * quoting myself:
> > * Simon Josefsson wrote on Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 12:17:32PM CEST:
> > > /bin/sh ../libtool --tag=CC   --mode=link gcc  -DLIBSSH2_DARWIN -I/
> > > usr/include -I/usr/include -no-install -L/usr/lib -lcrypto -L/usr/ 
> > > lib
> > > -lz -o simple simple.o ../src/libssh2.la
> > > mkdir .libs
> > > gcc -DLIBSSH2_DARWIN -I/usr/include -I/usr/include -o simple
> > > simple.o  -L/usr/lib ../src/.libs/libssh2.dylib -lcrypto -lz
> > > make  check-TESTS
> > > dyld: Library not loaded: /usr/local/lib/libssh2.1.dylib
> > >    Referenced from: /Users/daniel/Desktop/libssh2/tests/./simple
> > >    Reason: image not found
> > > FAIL: simple
> >
> > Looks like a Darwin-related (hint, hint! ;-) bug to me.
>
> Do I understand correctly that Darwin has no way to hardcode library
> paths (other than the ones given by -install-name)?  OK to apply and
> backport?  It fixes the stresstest failure exposed by my last patch.

Yes. Sorry, I have not been watching the list as closely as I should  
be. This looks okay to me, please apply.

Thanks,
Peter
--
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com