[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 6
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC] |
Date: |
Thu, 6 Mar 2008 20:12:05 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14) |
Hello Nelson,
* Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote on Thu, Mar 06, 2008 at 02:18:18AM CET:
> # -*- compilation -*-
> 35. am-subdir.at:33: testing ...
> libtoolize: putting auxiliary files in `.'.
> libtoolize: copying file `./ltmain.sh'
> libtoolize: putting macros in `m4'.
> libtoolize: copying file `m4/libtool.m4'
> libtoolize: copying file `m4/ltoptions.m4'
> libtoolize: copying file `m4/ltsugar.m4'
> libtoolize: copying file `m4/ltversion.m4'
> libtoolize: copying file `m4/lt~obsolete.m4'
> ./am-subdir.at:78: $ACLOCAL -I m4
> stderr:
> /usr/local/share/aclocal/yacc.m4:6: warning: underquoted definition of
> AM_PROG_YACC
> /usr/local/share/aclocal/yacc.m4:6: run info '(automake)Extending aclocal'
> /usr/local/share/aclocal/yacc.m4:6: or see
> http://sources.redhat.com/automake/automake.html#Extending-aclocal
> stdout:
> ./am-subdir.at:78: $AUTOMAKE --add-missing
> stderr:
> configure.ac:5: installing `./compile'
> configure.ac:3: installing `./config.sub'
> configure.ac:2: installing `./missing'
> configure.ac:2: installing `./install-sh'
> configure.ac:3: installing `./config.guess'
> Makefile.am: installing `./depcomp'
> automake: ####################
> automake: ## Internal Error ##
> automake: ####################
> automake: Unknown ?token? `LZMA' (neg = 0)
> automake: Please contact <address@hidden>.
> at /usr/local/share/automake-1.10/Automake/Channels.pm line 570
> Automake::Channels::msg('automake', '', 'Unknown ?token? `LZMA\' (neg =
> 0)') called at /usr/local/share/automake-1.10/Automake/ChannelDefs.pm line 191
> Automake::ChannelDefs::prog_error('Unknown ?token? `LZMA\' (neg = 0)')
> called at /usr/local/bin/automake line 6406
> Automake::transform('?LZMA?', 'HASH(0x104aa0d0)') called at
> /usr/local/bin/automake line 6469
>
> Automake::make_paragraphs('/usr/local/share/automake-1.10/am/distdir.am',
> 'GETTEXT', 0, 'DISTCHECK-HOOK', '', 'FILENAME_FILTER', '', 'DIST-TARGETS',
> '', ...) called at /usr/local/bin/automake line 6539
> Automake::file_contents_internal(1,
> '/usr/local/share/automake-1.10/am/distdir.am',
> 'Automake::Location=HASH(0x105b3d30)', 'DISTCHECK-HOOK', '', 'GETTEXT', 0,
> 'FILENAME_FILTER', '', ...) called at /usr/local/bin/automake line 6719
> Automake::file_contents('distdir',
> 'Automake::Location=HASH(0x105b3d30)', 'DIST-TARGETS', '', 'GETTEXT', 0,
> 'DISTCHECK-HOOK', '', 'FILENAME_FILTER', ...) called at
> /usr/local/bin/automake line 3688
> Automake::handle_dist() called at /usr/local/bin/automake line 7493
> Automake::generate_makefile('Makefile.am', 'Makefile.in') called at
> /usr/local/bin/automake line 7834
> stdout:
> ./am-subdir.at:78: exit code was 255, expected 0
> ./am-subdir.at:78: grep 'require .*but have' stderr && (exit 77)
> 35. am-subdir.at:33: 35. C subdir-objects (am-subdir.at:33): FAILED
> (am-subdir.at:78)
Could it be possible that, on your system,
/usr/local/share/automake-1.10/Automake/Channels.pm
is from Automake 1.10.1, but
/usr/local/bin/automake
is from Automake 1.10? If so, how did you manage to get it that way?
It would explain this failure.
Thanks,
Ralf
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], (continued)
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/06
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/06
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/06
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Peter O'Gorman, 2008/03/06
- compiler found but not functional (was: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53) 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/06
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/06
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/03/06
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Ralf Wildenhues, 2008/03/06
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Gary V. Vaughan, 2008/03/06
- Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC], Bob Friesenhahn, 2008/03/06
Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 19 35 36 44 45 46 48 49 50 51 52 53 60 61 62 64 failed [GNU/Linux PowerPC],
Ralf Wildenhues <=