Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC]

[Peter O'Gorman]

Peter O'Gorman wrote:
> Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote:
> 
> 
>>> libtool: link: f90 -shared  -Qoption ld --whole-archive ./.libs/liba1.a 
>>> ./.libs/liba2.a -Qoption ld --no-whole-archive     -Qoption ld -soname 
>>> -Qoption ld liba12.so.0 -o .libs/liba12.so.0.0.0
>>> /convenience.at:211: exit code was 1, expected 0
>>> 18. convenience.at:169: 18. FC convenience archives (convenience.at:169): 
>>> FAILED (convenience.at:211)
> 
> Libtool detected FC as f90, but otherwise used the gcc tools. I'll look
> into this.
> 

Because we generally use the same archive_cmds for F77, FC as for CXX,
things can get a little messed up. This "fixes" the most common case,
gcc, g++, g77/gfortran & some other fortran compiler, by pretending the
"other fortran compiler" does not exist.

Thoughts?

Peter
-- 
Peter O'Gorman
http://pogma.com

2008-03-06  Peter O'Gorman  <address@hidden>

        * libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 (_LT_PROG_FC): Report FC=no if the FC
        compiler is not a GNU compiler and the CXX compiler is a GNU
        compiler.
        Reported by Nelson H. F. Beebe.

Index: libltdl/m4/libtool.m4
===================================================================
RCS file: /sources/libtool/libtool/libltdl/m4/libtool.m4,v
retrieving revision 1.138
diff -u -r1.138 libtool.m4
--- libltdl/m4/libtool.m4       4 Mar 2008 21:14:22 -0000       1.138
+++ libltdl/m4/libtool.m4       7 Mar 2008 01:00:35 -0000
@@ -6644,6 +6644,15 @@
 if test -z "$FC" || test "X$FC" = "Xno"; then
   _lt_disable_FC=yes
 fi
+
+# If g++ is being used, but the fortran compiler is not a gnu
+# compiler, we should simply ignore it. It will not grok -shared, for
+# example.
+if test "x$ac_cv_fc_compiler_gnu" != "x$GXX"; then
+  FC=no 
+  _lt_disable_FC=yes
+fi
+
 popdef([AC_MSG_ERROR])
 ])# _LT_PROG_FC