Re: [libtool 2.2] testsuite: 18 19 64 failed [Solaris 7 SPARC]

[Gary V. Vaughan]

On 6 Mar 2008, at 20:04, Peter O'Gorman wrote:

Peter O'Gorman wrote:

Nelson H. F. Beebe wrote:

libtool: link: f90 -shared  -Qoption ld --whole-archive ./.libs/liba1.a ./.libs/liba2.a -Qoption ld --no-whole-archive     -Qoption ld -soname -Qoption ld liba12.so.0 -o .libs/liba12.so.0.0.0

/convenience.at:211: exit code was 1, expected 0

18. convenience.at:169: 18. FC convenience archives (convenience.at:169): FAILED (convenience.at:211)

Libtool detected FC as f90, but otherwise used the gcc tools. I'll look

into this.

Because we generally use the same archive_cmds for F77, FC as for CXX,
things can get a little messed up. This "fixes" the most common case,
gcc, g++, g77/gfortran & some other fortran compiler, by pretending the
"other fortran compiler" does not exist.

Thoughts?

What happens to a project written with gnu C and vendor fortran?  Will this test spot g++ and refuse to build the fortran files?

Maybe we should look into tagging the archive_cmds instead.

Cheers,

Gary

-- 

  <=====.                   Email me: address@hidden

 / @ @  /|           Read my blog: http://blog.azazil.net

 \      \\      ...and my book: http://sources.redhat.com/autobook

  \^^^^^^\\

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part