Re: Upgrading libltdl does not remove old macros

[Gary V. Vaughan]

On 16 Apr 2008, at 17:14, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> "Gary V. Vaughan" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > But there is no way to be sure whether acinclude.m4 contains  
> > nothing more
> > than
> > old versions of libtool macros. Therefore it is not safe to delete  
> > the
> > file even
> > if libtoolize does see its old macros in there.
>
> We are talking about acinclude.m4 inside libltdl, a directory more or
> less owned by libtool (all other files in there are overwritten by
> libtoolize --force).  Do people really put their own macros there?


Ah, I see.  I had forgotten about recursive libltdl builds.  But, I  
thought
that we already ran 'rm -rf libltdl' as part of 'libtoolize --force -- 
ltdl'.
I'll look into it and prepare a patch.

Cheers,
        Gary
--
  ())_.              Email me: address@hidden
  ( '/           Read my blog: http://blog.azazil.net
  / )=         ...and my book: http://sources.redhat.com/autobook
`(_~)_

PGP.sig
Description: This is a digitally signed message part