bug-libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: LT 2.2 series regression


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: Re: LT 2.2 series regression
Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 19:42:05 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.17+20080114 (2008-01-14)

Hi Jeff,

* Jeff Squyres wrote on Sun, May 25, 2008 at 03:25:20PM CEST:
> This patch unfortunately does not seem to work -- here's some output  
> from the build:
>
> /bin/sh ../../../libtool   --mode=compile ifort -I../../../ompi/include 
> -I../../../ompi/include -I. -I. -I../../../ompi/mpi/f90   -c -o 
> mpi_wtick_f90.lo mpi_wtick_f90.f90
> libtool: compile:  ifort -I../../../ompi/include -I../../../ompi/include 
> -I. -I. -I../../../ompi/mpi/f90 -c mpi_wtick_f90.f90  -o .libs/ 
> mpi_wtick_f90.o
> ./scripts/mpi_wtime_f90.f90.sh /users/jsquyres/svn/ompi/ompi/mpi/f90 >  
> mpi_wtime_f90.f90
>
> Note that it still doesn't have a -fPIC in there.  Looking in the output 
> of configure, it's still trying to use -KPIC:
>
> checking for ifort option to produce PIC... -KPIC
> checking if ifort PIC flag -KPIC works... no
>
> I notice that you patched [opal/]libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 -- did you mean  
> to patch config/libtool.m4?   I tried patching both of these, but got  
> the same result (listed above).

Are you sure that you re-ran autogen.sh after patching
config/libtool.m4?  Because over here, I can reproduce
the fact that -KPIC was used before, and -fPIC with the
patch.

I wonder whether, for the top level of ompi, you should run
libtoolize with --install, so that config/libtool.m4 and the
like are automatically replaced (--install is new with
Libtool 2.2).

Cheers,
Ralf




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]