[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: libtool, OS X, and GNU ranlib
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: libtool, OS X, and GNU ranlib |
Date: |
Thu, 10 Sep 2009 21:04:18 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-09) |
* Bob Friesenhahn wrote on Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 08:21:32PM CEST:
> On Thu, 10 Sep 2009, Ralf Wildenhues wrote:
> >
> >IMHO, people installing to /usr need to know what they are doing.
>
> s/need to/should/g
Yes.
> >Enabling --program-prefix=g with --prefix=/usr would be quite a surprise
> >for everyone else who is otherwise familiar with GCS, so I'd prefer not
> >to go that way.
>
> Right. I think that it is better for libtool to error out during
> configuration if it detects that the user would be destroying the
> Apple version.
Yes. Be sure to not error out in the case that the smart user is cross
compiling for another system from Darwin, or intends to DESTDIR-install
to a staging area, or similar use case that *they* might know to be
sensible but *we* may not. A warning is of course prudent. But just to
drive the point home again: this issue is not a bug in Libtool, it is a
user error. We do not need to fix it.
Thanks,
Ralf
- libtool, OS X, and GNU ranlib, Bob Friesenhahn, 2009/09/09
- Re: libtool, OS X, and GNU ranlib, Peter O'Gorman, 2009/09/09
- Re: libtool, OS X, and GNU ranlib, Bob Friesenhahn, 2009/09/10
- Re: libtool, OS X, and GNU ranlib, Bob Friesenhahn, 2009/09/10
- Re: libtool, OS X, and GNU ranlib, Peter O'Gorman, 2009/09/10
- Re: libtool, OS X, and GNU ranlib, Bob Friesenhahn, 2009/09/10
- Re: libtool, OS X, and GNU ranlib, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/09/10
- Re: libtool, OS X, and GNU ranlib, Bob Friesenhahn, 2009/09/10
- Re: libtool, OS X, and GNU ranlib,
Ralf Wildenhues <=