[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: newfangled sh in libtool
From: |
Ralf Wildenhues |
Subject: |
Re: newfangled sh in libtool |
Date: |
Sun, 27 Sep 2009 08:38:13 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-09) |
Hi Karl,
* Karl Berry wrote on Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 02:37:20AM CEST:
> In the func_arith function in libtool 2.2.6, the "newfangled" $(( ... ))
> sh construct is used. In particular, Solaris 5.10 /bin/sh does not
> recognize it:
> I'm not sure if this is the only place where such a thing is used, but
> it's the only one I've run across. It's rather a drag, since it means
> every libtool-using package has to check for a "new" sh, even if the
> package itself doesn't need it.
libtool should only be using newer shell constructs with newer shells it
founds working; that means, you shouldn't have to adjust the package,
but the Libtool macros should have done all that for you. If that isn't
the case, then that indicates a bug, and we'd be interested in a way to
reproduce it, including: Autoconf, Automake versions used, package
source (or even better a reduced example), configure and make invocation
and output, and the shells available on this system.
Thanks,
Ralf
- newfangled sh in libtool, Karl Berry, 2009/09/26
- Re: newfangled sh in libtool, Bob Friesenhahn, 2009/09/26
- Re: newfangled sh in libtool, Karl Berry, 2009/09/27
- Re: newfangled sh in libtool, Peter Breitenlohner, 2009/09/28
- Re: newfangled sh in libtool, Peter Breitenlohner, 2009/09/28
- Re: newfangled sh in libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/09/28
- Re: newfangled sh in libtool, Peter Breitenlohner, 2009/09/29
- Re: newfangled sh in libtool, Ralf Wildenhues, 2009/09/29
Re: newfangled sh in libtool,
Ralf Wildenhues <=