bug-libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: warnings from openSuSE rpmlint


From: Křištof Želechovski
Subject: Re: warnings from openSuSE rpmlint
Date: Sun, 13 Feb 2011 12:42:32 +0100
User-agent: KMail/1.13.6 (Linux/2.6.34.7-0.7-desktop; KDE/4.6.0; x86_64; ; )

Dnia niedziela, 13 lutego 2011 o 08:25:16 Ralf Wildenhues napisał(a):
> Hello,
> 
> * Křištof Želechovski wrote on Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 09:44:28PM CET:
> > Dnia piątek, 11 lutego 2011 o 18:02:41 Peter O'Gorman napisał(a):
> > > On 02/11/2011 10:52 AM, Křištof Želechovski wrote:
> > > > Dnia piątek, 11 lutego 2011 o 15:25:58 Peter O'Gorman napisał(a):
> > > >> Although lt__alloc.c contains a definition of lt__alloc_die
> > > >> (alloc_die_default) which does exit() on memory allocation failures,
> > > >> this definition is overridden with one that does not in lt_dlinit.
> > > >
> > > > Can this definition be removed?
> > > 
> > > I don't see why.
> > 
> > If there is a path that leads into the code calling exit, the warning is 
> > valid.
> > If there is no such path, it can be safely removed.
> 
> Presumably, there is a path that leads into the code calling exit, but
> only if ltdl was used outside of its spec (e.g., calling other functions
> before lt_dlinit).  So, no, I don't think there are only two
> alternatives here.
> 
> That said, I'm not sure if there are any users that require the current
> construction except when debugging code that uses ltdl.  Anybody else?

How about a configure option to include the code on demand?

Chris



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]