|
From: | Peter O'Gorman |
Subject: | Re: warnings from openSuSE rpmlint |
Date: | Mon, 14 Feb 2011 10:38:14 -0600 |
User-agent: | Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.2.13) Gecko/20101209 Fedora/3.1.7-0.35.b3pre.fc13 Thunderbird/3.1.7 |
On 02/11/2011 11:10 AM, Peter O'Gorman wrote:
On 02/11/2011 10:52 AM, Křištof Želechovski wrote:libtool.x86_64: W: script-without-shebang /usr/share/libtool/config/ltmain.sh This text file has executable bits set or is located in a path dedicated for executables, but lacks a shebang and cannot thus be executed. If the file is meant to be an executable script, add the shebang, otherwise remove the executable bits or move the file elsewhere.Yeah, it's not meant to be executed as is, I guess it was easier to install it with the same rule as every other file in that dir.I would say it is easier to install it with permissions matching its status. What is easier depends on your POV. In the end, what is easier to the customer should prevail because there are more customers than developers.I'll look into this.
This passed all tests and make distcheck, I am pretty sure that nothing requires ltmain to be executable, but just in case someone knows better, I'm asking for approval :)
Ok? Peter
0001-Install-ltmain.sh-without-execute-bit-set.patch
Description: Text Data
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |