bug-libtool
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

bug#8441: Patches making libtool-2.4-1 build under GNU/Hurd


From: Ralf Wildenhues
Subject: bug#8441: Patches making libtool-2.4-1 build under GNU/Hurd
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2011 20:06:32 +0200
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2010-08-04)

Hi Svante,

* Svante Signell wrote on Thu, Apr 07, 2011 at 06:24:20PM CEST:
> The first defines shlibpath_overrides_runpath for gnu.

Is this always the correct setting?  binutils can be configured with
either as default.

> # shlibpath_overrides_runpath is set to 'unknown' in libtool.m4

Oh.  Then you have a good point.  This should go upstream.

> # and not defined under $host_os ="gnu"
> # This patch make the tests/*demo* run.
> --- libtool-2.4/libltdt/m4/libtool.m4.orig    2011-02-03 21:33:56.000000000 
> +0100
> +++ libtool-2.4/libltdl/m4/libtool.m4 2011-02-03 21:43:46.000000000 +0100
> @@ -2325,6 +2325,7 @@
>    library_names_spec='${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$versuffix 
> ${libname}${release}${shared_ext}${major} ${libname}${shared_ext}'
>    soname_spec='${libname}${release}${shared_ext}$major'
>    shlibpath_var=LD_LIBRARY_PATH
> +  shlibpath_overrides_runpath=no
>    hardcode_into_libs=yes
>    ;;

> # This test is broken for hurd-i386
> # Skip for $host_os = "gnu", since max_cmd_len=-1 to indicate that
> # max_cmd_len is not limited under GNU Hurd.
> #
> --- libtool-2.4/tests/cmdline_wrap.at.orig    2010-05-20 23:18:41.000000000 
> +0200
> +++ libtool-2.4/tests/cmdline_wrap.at 2011-02-06 11:08:29.000000000 +0100
> @@ -30,6 +30,9 @@
>  m4_ifdef([AT_CAPTURE_FILE],
>  [AT_CAPTURE_FILE([testsuite.log])])
>  
> +# Setting low max_cmd_len on "hurd-386" does not make sense"
> +AT_CHECK([if test "$host_os" == "gnu" ; then exit 77; fi])

Please use = not ==, the former is Posix test, the latter bash-specific.

Does this test actually fail on hurd-i386, or is this just because you
consider it wasted time?  In the former case, please send the patch
upstream but also show a cut-n-paste of the failing test log.

Thanks!
Ralf





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]