[OT]Re: feta20.enc not found

[David Bobroff]

On Sat, 2004-04-10 at 19:56, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> address@hidden writes:
> > > your best bet would be the tetex from Fedora core 1, because it is
> > > closest related to RH9.
> > 
> > Ok, do I need anything other than the obvious (obvious = tetex-*)?
> 
> no, probably not.

Han-Wen/Jan,

Thanks for the help with this.  I've installed tetex-2.0.2-8 from Fedora
core 1 and it seems to be working with LilyPond 2.3.0 (ChangeLog
1.2066).  When the RPMs were being installed I got a few warnings:

warning: /usr/share/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf created as
/usr/share/texmf/web2c/texmf.cnf.rpmnew

 /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/config.ps created as
/usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/config.ps.rpmnew


Now, I understand enough about this (I think) that this is a safegaurd
against overwriting some configuration files.  I don't recall having
done anything to these config files so is it probably safe to remove the
'.rpmnew' and append '.old' on the old files?  Am I correct that in the
following case the old file has the altered name?

warning: /usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/config.pdf saved as
/usr/share/texmf/dvips/config/config.pdf.rpmsave

Thanks,

David