Re: lilypond-book filename fragment option

[John Williams]

On Tue, 1 Jun 2004, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> > > lilypond-book in 2.2 will not choke on long files, if you break them
> > > in parts using \include.  Why do you need extra features, then?
>
> Can you provide an example of a file that chokes 2.2 lilypond-book ?

I tested files of up to 1 MB is size with lilypond-book-2.3.1, and they
all worked, so it looks like that problem is fixed on recent versions.

> > I would have thought the benefit of non-random filenames would be
> > self-evident, and I provided an example of when it was specifically
> > needed.
>
> I know, but I prefer to solve the underlying problem if possible.

I still would like to be able to name my .png files.  Would you accept a
patch to implement that feature?

~ John Williams