Re: Bug in lilypond-book latex output?

[Mats Bengtsson]

You are absolutely right! This bug has already been fixed in
version 2.2.3.

   /Mats

Lars Kellogg-Stedman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> While fiddling with lilypond-book (from lilypond version 2.2.1), I
> took a look at the generated code that replaces the \lilypond{}
> fragment in my LaTeX document.  It looks like this:
>
>   {\parindent 0pt
>   address@hidden
>   \ifx\preLilyPondExample\preLilyPondExample\fi
>   \def\lilypondbook{}
>   \input lily-161076161.tex
>   \ifx\preLilyPondExample\postLilyPondExample\fi
>   address@hidden
>
> I'm wondering if there isn't a problem in the handling of
> \postLilyPondExample.  I'm not familiar with TeX beyond the basics of
> LaTeX, but I'm assuming that \ifx tests if the following symbol is
> executable...so the second test:
>
>   \ifx\preLilyPondExample\postLilyPondExample\fi
>
> Is checking the wrong symbol, and would result in an error if someone
> defined \preLilyPondExample but did not define \postLilyPondExample.
>
> -- Lars
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond

--
=============================================
        Mats Bengtsson
        Signal Processing
        Signals, Sensors and Systems
        Royal Institute of Technology
        SE-100 44  STOCKHOLM
        Sweden
        Phone: (+46) 8 790 8463                         
        Fax:   (+46) 8 790 7260
        Email: address@hidden
        WWW: http://www.s3.kth.se/~mabe
=============================================