bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: lilypond-book refactor patch


From: Han-Wen Nienhuys
Subject: Re: lilypond-book refactor patch
Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 01:28:01 +0200

address@hidden writes:
> No.  Unfortunately, I just don't get excited about being on the bleeding
> edge of every package like you guys do.  I'm working off the binary rpm
> version of lilypond.  (Which means these patches are against the
> post-path-substituted version of lilypond-book.)
> 
> If you could point me at an rpm of mftrace, it would help a lot.  (I'm
> running fedora core 3, if it matters.)  I did a lilypond-2.4 compile on
> Jan 31, and that was worst thing to compile.  This was a non-root
> installation, so I had to compile _everything_ to get versions lilypond
> wanted.  Tex was easy; ghostscript was easy; mftrace was an unpleasant
> experience.  For example, I ended up compiling both autotrace and potrace,
> because mftrace would not compile with the first one I tried. (I think I
> tried autotrace first, but I don't remember for sure.)

see 

  http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/Fedora-3/mftrace-1.1.7-1.i386.rpm

I use it with the potrace binary from

  http://potrace.sourceforge.net/

> Anyhow, the html functions in lilypond-book seem a bit neglected, so I
> thought you guys might appreciate some help in that area.


sure we do, but in the past days I've had my share of having to clean
up after patches that have been sent to me untested.  There's a
problem in LilyPond CVS (in lilypond itself) that makes "make web" a
little problematic. I'll try to look it over in the coming days.


-- 

 Han-Wen Nienhuys   |   address@hidden   |   http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen 





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]