[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lilypond-book refactor patch
From: |
John Williams |
Subject: |
Re: lilypond-book refactor patch |
Date: |
Mon, 4 Apr 2005 23:14:21 -0600 (MDT) |
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> address@hidden writes:
> > No. Unfortunately, I just don't get excited about being on the bleeding
> > edge of every package like you guys do. I'm working off the binary rpm
> > version of lilypond. (Which means these patches are against the
> > post-path-substituted version of lilypond-book.)
> >
> > If you could point me at an rpm of mftrace, it would help a lot. (I'm
> > running fedora core 3, if it matters.)
>
> see
> http://lilypond.org/download/binaries/Fedora-3/mftrace-1.1.7-1.i386.rpm
Thanks, I was trying to find one at http://www.xs4all.nl/~hanwen/mftrace/
Maybe you could add a link there.
> I use it with the potrace binary from
>
> http://potrace.sourceforge.net/
>
> > Anyhow, the html functions in lilypond-book seem a bit neglected, so I
> > thought you guys might appreciate some help in that area.
>
> sure we do, but in the past days I've had my share of having to clean
> up after patches that have been sent to me untested. There's a
> problem in LilyPond CVS (in lilypond itself) that makes "make web" a
> little problematic. I'll try fix that, and look over your patch in the
> coming days; however, I would greatly appreciate it if you would give
> it a whirl too.
I understand the frustration. I'll try to do something this week.
Anything you can do to make lilypond easier to compile, will make it
easier for us to test things.
~ John Williams