Re: scheme function doesn't work anymore

[VSD]

Thanks for the answer. Indeed \mychords are within a \score block. The  
exact input file is:

%%%%%%%%%%

ChordOffset = #(def-music-function (parser location offset) (pair?)
    #{
        \override ChordNames.ChordName #'extra-offset = #$offset
    #}
)

mychords = \chordmode
{
    \ChordOffset #'(-0.75 . 0)
     ges2:maj7.4+ des2:9
}

\score { \mychords }

%EOF%

That's strange if this works for you. I've done a fresh install of  
2.5.29-2 (instead of an upgrade) and still have the problem. I'm using now  
LilyTool for jEdit, and the internal console shows another clue when  
trying to compile:

Processing `C:/music/kk.ly'
Parsing...ERROR: Unbound variable: lilyvartmpc

Shuch error don't appears in the log file. It just stucks on "Parsing...".

Nevertheless, moving back to version 2.5.29-1 compiles the file perfectly.

¿What I'm missing?

Vincent (Confused)



On Tue, 14 Jun 2005 17:30:41 +0200, Mats Bengtsson  
<address@hidden> wrote:

> I hope you include \mychords within a \score{...} block,
> otherwise you won't get any output. I tried your lines of code
> extended with
> \score{\mychords}
> and certainly get some output using 2.5.30.
>
>     /Mats
>
> VSD wrote:
> > I was successfully using the following simple scheme function in all  
> > the  2.5.x series until 2.5.29-1 (all win native under WXP):
> >  ChordOffset = #(def-music-function (parser location offset) (pair?)
> >     #{
> >         \override ChordNames.ChordName #'extra-offset = #$offset
> >     #}
> > )
> >  mychords = \chordmode
> > {
> >     \ChordOffset #'(-0.75 . 0)
> >      ges2:maj7.4+ des2:9 ...
> > }
> >  but in version 2.5.29-2 this doesn't work anymore. The log file is:
> >  # -*-compilation-*-
> > Changing working directory to `C:/music/tst'
> > Processing `C:/music/kk.ly'
> > Parsing...
> >   ... and I don't get any output file. If I replace the function call  
> > by the  corresponding lilypond code:
> >  \override ChordNames.ChordName #'extra-offset = #'(-0.75 . 0)
> >  then it works as expected.
> >  Is this a bug or am I doing something wrong?
> >  Thanks and greetings,
> >  Vincent
> >     _______________________________________________