[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Score parts: instrument and duration
From: |
Erik Sandberg |
Subject: |
Re: Score parts: instrument and duration |
Date: |
Tue, 16 Aug 2005 23:54:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
KMail/1.8.1 |
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 22.54, Hans Aberg wrote:
> But TeX was developed once, too. Its author got tired, putting the
> lid on further development, having the copyright. It could happen
> with LilyPond, too, if one arrives the point where one has the
> reached limits of the current setup.
This is not true, both Lily and TeX is free software. Anyone can take up
development whenever the original developers get tired.
Erik
- Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, (continued)
- Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Han-Wen Nienhuys, 2005/08/14
- Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/08/15
- Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Hans Aberg, 2005/08/15
- Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/08/15
- Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Hans Aberg, 2005/08/15
- Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Mats Bengtsson, 2005/08/16
- Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Hans Aberg, 2005/08/16
- Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Erik Sandberg, 2005/08/16
- Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Hans Aberg, 2005/08/16
- Re: Score parts: instrument and duration,
Erik Sandberg <=
- Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Hans Aberg, 2005/08/16
- Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Daniel Johnson, 2005/08/15
Re: Score parts: instrument and duration, Hans Aberg, 2005/08/15