bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: V.2.6.3 failure, Fedora Core 4


From: John Mandereau
Subject: Re: V.2.6.3 failure, Fedora Core 4
Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2005 17:32:10 +0200

Han-Wen Nienhuys wrote:
> Lars-Erik Thorelli wrote:
> > I installed Fedora Core 4 from the DVD in the recent "Bible" by
> > Christopher Negus without problems.
> > Then I installed Lilypond, documentation, ghostscript, and compatibility
> > libraries from   http://www.lilypond.org/web/install/#2.6  . All seemed
> > well.
> > 
> > Executing the command  "lilypond Test.ly"  sadly produced the message:
> > 
> > ==========================
> > GNU LilyPond 2.6.3
> > /usr/share/guile/1.6/srfi/srfi-13.scm:159:1: In procedure dynamic-link
> > in expression (load-extension "libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1"
> > "scm_init_srfi_13"):
> > /usr/share/guile/1.6/srfi/srfi-13.scm:159:1: file:
> > "libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1", message:
> > "libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1.so: cannot open shared object file: No
> > such file or directory"
> 
> > address@hidden ~]# ls -l /usr/lib/libguile-srfi*
> > lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root    37 Aug 21
> > 12:15 /usr/lib/libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1.so.1 ->
> > libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1.so.1.0.0
> 
> this is the one. What happens if you run ldconfig? And if you symlink
> this one to libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1.so

Sorry to reply instead of Lars-Erik, but I was recently hurt by the same
problem when installing FC4 on another computer. I didn't notice
anything when runnning ldconfig but creating the first symlink of this
list solved the problem.

address@hidden lib]$ ls -l libguile-srfi*.so*
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root    37 sep  5 21:14 libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1.so -> 
libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1.so.1.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root    37 sep  4 21:54 libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1.so.1 -> 
libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1.so.1.0.0
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 78352 mar  2  2005 libguile-srfi-srfi-13-14-v-1.so.1.0.0
lrwxrwxrwx  1 root root    33 sep  4 21:54 libguile-srfi-srfi-4-v-1.so.1 -> 
libguile-srfi-srfi-4-v-1.so.1.0.0
-rwxr-xr-x  1 root root 32832 mar  2  2005 libguile-srfi-srfi-4-v-1.so.1.0.0

This problem already existed in 2.5.29 rpm, as I reported in a previous
message. I didn't understand it was just a missing symlink, so I
compiled from source; and, guess what, the 2.6.x rpms I installed later
on the same FC4 box worked fine! What I conclude is that the
installation from source has created the good symlink that is missing in
the RPM.

(If it can help, I have installed FC4 on both machines from scratch.)
-- 
John Mandereau <address@hidden>





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]