Re: Fix for proper C++ conformance

[Erik Sandberg]

On Wednesday 05 October 2005 08.10, Wiz Aus wrote:
> Managed to get all the lilypond code to at least *compile* now, although a
> long way off linking and running!
>
> All this does is ensure that member functions aren't stored directly as
> standalone function pointers - it creates a thunk or proxy function to call
> the member function and then stores that.
> The thunks get created whether they're needed or not, but maybe a really
> good compiler would optimization them out (doubtful).
> I do have to ask though - why on earth not do these as regular virtual
> functions??

I think it's related to efficiency. I think those functions were added during 
a massive optimization.

Anyway, you haven't mentioned which compiler you're using, and which commands 
you've used for building. If you aren't using GCC, then that's probably the 
problem.

-- 
Erik