Re: Trill spanners too short

[Tuukka Verho]

On Wed, 2006-10-04 at 18:03 -0700, Graham Percival wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Could you create a small snippet that demonstrates this problem?
> 
> Thanks,
> - Graham

Ok.

\version "2.9.21"
\paper {
ragged-right = ##t
}

<<
\new Staff {
f'2\startTrillSpan c'8\stopTrillSpan c'8 
c'8\startTrillSpan c'8\stopTrillSpan
}
>>

IMO the trill should be at least twice as long as it is in the example.
Notice also the weird placement of the second trill.

You can also see the problem in the trill spanner regression test.
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.9/input/regression/collated-files.html

> 
> 
> Tuukka Verho wrote:
> > Version 2.9.20 produces too short trill spanners (or at least they seem
> > too short to me). The "trill spanner" regression test illustrates the
> > problem well enough. In addition, in cases when the spanner is so short
> > that no trill line is shown, the "tr" symbol is still left-aligned,
> > instead of centered as it should (like with \trill).
> > 
> > However, even with these problems I see this as an improvement to the
> > previous behaviour -- the tendency to extend the trill line over the
> > next note was very annoying in earlier versions. Thanks to the
> > developers for fixing that!
> > 
> > Tuukka Verho
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > bug-lilypond mailing list
> > address@hidden
> > http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
> > 
>