[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Finger-flag collision
From: |
address@hidden |
Subject: |
Re: Finger-flag collision |
Date: |
Fri, 11 May 2012 17:49:27 +0200 |
On 11 mai 2012, at 16:39, Trevor Daniels wrote:
>
> address@hidden Friday, May 11, 2012 3:22 PM
>
>
>> On 11 mai 2012, at 16:13, David Kastrup wrote:
>>
>>> Mike Solomon <address@hidden> writes:
>>>
>>>>> I'm not top posting.
>>>>
>>>> \relative c' {
>>>> \set fingeringOrientations = #'(right)
>>>> <a-5 c-3>8
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> Results in flag-on-number and number-on-number collisions.
>>>
>>> Regression?
>>>
>>
>> Same result in 2.14.2 and 2.15.35.
>>
>> Haven't tested in 2.12.
>>
>> I'm not sure if it's a regression, but it's ugly :(
>
> Side-fingering has always (at least since 2.12) been too close in
> notes a third apart; that's why I chose to show how to reduce the
> font-size in the LM (see towards the bottom of
> http://www.lilypond.org/doc/v2.14/Documentation/learning/within_002dstaff-objects
> )
> I've attached a cutting from the 2.12 LM pdf, which is just
> as bad as Mike's. So no regression.
>
> Not sure about the flag. The flag shape and stem length were
> changed some time ago; maybe this was a contributing factor.
There isn't any code in place that'd implement flag-fingering collision
avoidance. It wouldn't be too much work - if a tracker item is opened, I'll
try to get around to it over the summer, but I wanted to touch base first to
make sure that it hadn't already been reported/documented.
Cheers,
MS