Re: Documentation suggestion: Including LilyPond files

[Colin Hall]

On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 11:07:05PM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
> I think I stumbled over a bit of misleading or wrong information in the NR.

I agree. I had a look and found issue 391 entitled "using relative filepath in 
\include "foo.ly""

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=391

It looks like this was fixed in 2009 and released in the 2.12.x series.

> Please have a look at the following documentation suggestion and
> incorporate it into the NR if you find it correct:

I haven't tested it but going by the issue tracker your suggestion
makes sense. Thanks very much for doing a thorough job.

See new documentation tracker:

http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2558

-- 

Colin Hall