[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: TupletNumber regression
From: |
Keith OHara |
Subject: |
Re: TupletNumber regression |
Date: |
Wed, 23 May 2012 20:47:49 +0000 (UTC) |
User-agent: |
Loom/3.14 (http://gmane.org/) |
John David Duncan <john.david.duncan <at> gmail.com> writes:
> > In LilyPond 2.15.38, TupletNumber placement automatically follows
> > the voice, not the stem direction. You've inverted the traditional
> > stem direction of voices (usually the top voice points up), and the
> > TupletNumber does not automatically follow this. To change this,
> > you can add an \override TupletBracket #'direction = #UP in your
> > upward-pointing voice.
>
> Thanks, Mike. I think you're right that it should be noted in the
> docs, but I can adapt to the new behavior without a problem.
>
Just to be clear, Eluze's suggestion was to use \voiceOne to automatically
put stems and other things on the usual side, if you use the <<...\\...>>
construction the first ... is set as \voiceOne, so this works without
change across all recent versions:
\language "english"
<< {
\times 2/3 { g''8[ af'' c'''] } df'''8 f'''
\ottava #+1
\times 2/3 { <g'' g'''>8 \( <af'' af'''> <g'' g'''> \) }
\times 2/3 { <f'' f'''> \( <df'' df'''> <f'' f'''> \) }
\ottava #0
} \\ {
df''2\arpeggio s2
} >>