[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Doc-suggestion re lyrics/melismas
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Doc-suggestion re lyrics/melismas |
Date: |
Fri, 25 May 2012 07:43:49 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.1.50 (gnu/linux) |
Colin Hall <address@hidden> writes:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 12:36:21PM +0200, Urs Liska wrote:
>> Am 23.05.2012 00:43, schrieb -Eluze:
>> >
>> >Urs Liska-3 wrote:
>> >>Doc suggestion concerning melisma behaviour.
>> >>
>> >>in
>> >>
>> >>2.1.1 Common notation for vocal music
>> >>
>> >>section
>> >>
>> >>Multiple notes to one syllable
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>before or after the second example (about slurs) please add something
>> >>like:
>> >>"Note that phrasing slurs don't affect the creation of melismas."
>> >>
>> >
>> > personally I don't think anybody would expect that phrasing slurs affect
>> > melismata…
>
> I agree.
If he had considered the consequences and there were no technical
obstacles.
>> Well, through the (Slurs) documentation one is somehow led to
>> believe slurs and phrasing slurs are practically the same and only
>> separated for nesting purposes.
>
> I agree with this too.
>
>> So it would be nice if at this point of the NR it was clearly
>> pointed out that there _are_ differences for the handling of
>> melismas.
>
> I've created a documentation tracker here:
>
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2565
And I think it's important since it stops making the choice sort of
arbitrary.
--
David Kastrup