Re: A few regressiontest-2.15.41.pdf results

[Colin Hall]

On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 09:50:46PM +0200, Marek Klein wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> 2012/7/16 ArnoldTheresius <address@hidden>
> 
> >
> > beam-collision-basic.ly:
> > collision of notehad and beam in measure 6, beat 3 + 1/8
> >
> > beamlet-test.ly:
> > Looks inconsistent to me in some quintuplets
> > - measure 1, 3rd group
> > - measure 2, 1st group
> > - measure 5, 2nd group, 2nd bemlet
> > Isue 11, Comment 31, Screenshot-1.png looks good and is what I would
> > expect.
> > (i.e. in quituplets the five 'internal beats' are used to dertermine the
> > direction)

Thanks for the report of those two regressions, Arnold.

> >
> > By the way, I was not shure for which criteria to search in the issues
> > list.

Just put a few keywords into the search box. Usually works for me.

> Is this a bug report? I do not understand.
> Anyone else?

Sure. In this email Arnold is highlighting some unexpected differences in
output between 2.15.40 and 2.15.41 that he has noticed. Phil Holmes
emailed bug-lilypond a few days ago on the same subject.

See:
http://lilypond.org/development.html

which links to the regression test output:
http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/input/regression/collated-files.html

It is a bug squad responsibility to check the regression test output
when a new revision of Lilypond comes out. See:

http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.15/Documentation/contributor/bug-squad-checklists

so Arnold and Phil are doing us a favour.

You've done a bunch of work already today, Marek. I'll create the trackers.

Cheers,
Colin.

-- 

Colin Hall