bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [musicxml2ly] unwanted staves and voices [was: missing <voice>-eleme


From: pls
Subject: Re: [musicxml2ly] unwanted staves and voices [was: missing <voice>-element in chorded note leads to unwanted additional staff]
Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2012 17:04:08 +0200

My test files obviously got lost. :(
Am 29.09.2012 um 14:24 schrieb pls:

> Sorry, this is killing me. :(
> Am 29.09.2012 um 13:19 schrieb pls:
> 
>> 
>> Am 28.09.2012 um 12:09 schrieb pls:
>> 
>>> A <note>-element containing a <chord/>- and a <staff>-element but no 
>>> <voice>-element causes an additional empty staff above the defined one.
>>> 
>>> Tiny example:
>>> <missing_voice-element_in_a_chorded_note_leads_to_empty_second_staff.xml>
>>> 
>>> (unwanted) result: 
>>> <missing_voice-element_in_a_chorded_note_leads_to_empty_second_staff.png>
>>> 
>>> The wrong MusicXML-markup was caused by Sibelius 7.0.0.
>>> 
>>> In this case musicxml2ly puts the chorded note without a <voice>-element in 
>>> an own voice (PartPOneVoiceNone) instead of placing the notes in a chord 
>>> construct (< a' c''>1) in the same voice. She also surrounds the \context 
>>> Staff block by an additional \new Staff block which causes the additional 
>>> staff.
>> 
>>> 
>>> musicxml2ly should be taught to be tolerant and automatically assign notes 
>>> containing <chord/>-elements to the voice of the first note of the chord. 
>>> (This first note does not contain a <chord/>-element.)
>> 
>> 
>> Hm, the above obviously seems to tell only half the story: Without a 
>> <staff>-element the .xml-file does NOT cause an additional empty staff above 
>> the normal one even though two voices are exported and the \context Staff 
>> block is surrounded by a \new Staff block. So this means that I have to 
>> correct myself. There are two issues involved here:
>> 
>> 1) if an .xml file contains only <staff> elements with value "1" (i.e. 
>> <staff>1</staff>) musicxml2ly erroneously thinks that there are several 
>> staves.
> 
> This bug is even more complicated and it seems to interact with the issue 
> described below:
> 
> if an .xml file contains only <staff> elements with value "1" (i.e. 
> <staff>1</staff>) AND no <voice> element in a chorded note musicxml2ly 
> erroneously thinks that there are several staves. (I haven't tested what 
> happens when there are several <staff> elements with different values in an 
> .xml fle.
> 
> Test file: 
https://www.dropbox.com/s/l9mt7iqd38lqqng/unwanted_staves.xml
>> The result is:
> 
>> 
>> \new Staff <<
>>           \context Staff ="1" << 
>>               \context Voice = "PartPOneVoiceOne" { \voiceOne 
>> \PartPOneVoiceOne }
>>               \context Voice = "PartPOneVoiceNone" { \voiceTwo 
>> \PartPOneVoiceNone }
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> This leads to a second unwanted empty staff.
>> 
>> Without any <staff> element in the .xml file the result is:
>> 
>> \new Staff <<
>>           \context Staff << 
>>               \context Voice = "PartPOneVoiceOne" { \voiceOne 
>> \PartPOneVoiceOne }
>>               \context Voice = "PartPOneVoiceNone" { \voiceTwo 
>> \PartPOneVoiceNone }
>>>> 
>>>> 
>> 
>> and there is NO unwanted additional staff!
>> 
>> In this case musicxml2ly should be taught to ignore the element value if 
>> there is only one staff.
>> 
>> 2) if a <note> element contains a <chord/> element but no <voice> element 
>> musicxml2ly puts the chorded note without a <voice>-element in an own voice 
>> (PartPOneVoiceNone) instead of placing the notes in a chord construct (< a' 
>> c''>1) in the same voice.
>> 
>> In this case musicxml2ly should be taught to be tolerant and automatically 
>> assign notes containing <chord/>-elements to the voice of the first note of 
>> the chord. (In MusicXML the first note of a chord does not contain a 
>> <chord/>-element.)
> Test file:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/8bep4ly69xfwfmt/unwanted_voices.xml
> 
> 
>> 
>> hth
>> patrick
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> bug-lilypond mailing list
>> address@hidden
>> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]