Re: Fingering output change 2.17.9 -> 2.17.10

[Nick Payne]

On 16/02/13 23:17, Colin Hall wrote:
> Nick Payne writes:
>
> > On 14/01/13 17:31, Keith OHara wrote:
> > > Nick Payne <nick.payne <at> internode.on.net> writes:
> > >
> > > > To indicate guide fingering I've been using the code below. In 2.17.10,
> > > > the fingering with guide is placed above the stem even though
> > > > Fingering.add-stem-support = ##f. In 2.17.9 and earlier it was placed at
> > > > the same height as normal fingering.
> > > Mike changed the fingering placement  so that they go as close as they fit,
> > > for issue <http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=2764>
> > >
> > > It looks like your custom fingering stencil has a faked (shifted) extent
> > > so that it lines up as you wish.  The fingering will fit, but its faked
> > > extent interferes with the stem.  If I narrow the faked extent a bit, the
> > > fingering slides down along the stem.
> > This hack seems to do the trick:
> Nick, I'm cleaning up bug-lilypond unanswered reports, and found this
> one from you.
>
> I take it that you have succeeded in updating your scheme code to
> deal with the change in fingering.
>
> So, I'm deciding that there is no bug here, and I trust that you are ok with
> that.

Yes, that particular problem was sorted, but see 
http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3171, which is a 
different problem with the same code that only shows up on 2.17.

Nick