Re: Problem with 'transparent doc-snippet

[Phil Holmes]

"Urs Liska" <address@hidden> wrote in message 
news:address@hidden
> Am 29.04.2013 17:42, schrieb Trevor Daniels:
> > Urs Liska wrote Monday, April 29, 2013 4:14 PM
> >
> >
> > > Am 29.04.2013 16:57, schrieb Trevor Daniels:
> > > > This snippet is in the LSR, so changes should be made by amending the
> > > > snippet there, otherwise it remains wrong in the LSR.
> > > Do I recall correctly having read that _now_ (whatever this is) Flags
> > > are treated as separate objects while _earlier_ they were part of the 
> > > stem?
> > > In the LSR the snippet displays correctly, whereas in the docs we have
> > > the 'floating' Flags.
> > >
> > > What to do about that?
> > > I think it is 'correct' in the LSR but not in the docs, so it should
> > > either be removed from the docs (i.e. the doc tag removed) or updated
> > > separately in the docs.
> > Ah, I'd missed that point.  If the change is only required for 2.17 on, 
> > then
> > your original patch to snippets/new was correct.  Sorry about that.
> It is also required for 2.16.0 (the change in behaviour obviously was 
> between 2.14 and 2.16).
> But :
> > > But I would suggest to remove this snippet from the docs because it's
> > > not the right thing to do anyway.
> > > What should I exactly do to submit a snippet to the LSR with the
> > > intention to adding it to the docs?
> > Just submit it and tag it with the appropriate tags.
> >
> > Trevor
> OK, what is necessary now is:
> a) submit a new example for making objects transparent
> b) update the cross-voice example using 'stencil and submit that
> c) remove the doc tag from the existing example.

Don't do that.  The snippet in /new will overwrite the snippet in the LSR 
when the import happens.  In principle, the snippet in the LSR would then be 
updated when the LSR is.

> I'll try to do that.
> Urs

--
Phil Holmes
Bug Squad