[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Omitted rests should not collide with anything
From: |
David Kastrup |
Subject: |
Re: Omitted rests should not collide with anything |
Date: |
Sat, 22 Jun 2013 13:30:55 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) |
Eluze <address@hidden> writes:
> Pavel Roskin wrote
>> If rests are omitted, they should not collide with anything. But they
>> do. Example:
>>
>> I get a warning:
>>
>> rests.ly:6:20: warning: cannot resolve rest collision: rest direction not
>> set
>> \new Voice {
>> r4 }
>
> if you omit "\omit Rest" you get exactly the same messages!
>
> so I think polyphonic notation with \voiceXXX should be used.
I think the point was that if the rest is getting omitted, it should not
have a chance to be colliding with anything.
Basically, the expectation being that \omit r4 and s4 should be
equivalent. It is a plausible expectation, but it seems like matching
this class of expectations consistently could amount to quite a lot of
work. At least in this particular case, I don't really see what the
return would be: this does not look like anything that could not better
be done using other commands.
Partly it might be the fault of having constructed a minimal example:
one that clearly shows the perceived symptom, but not really a
compelling motivation for wanting to change the behavior.
Perhaps some more info about the use case might help with prioritizing
this?
--
David Kastrup
- Omitted rests should not collide with anything, Pavel Roskin, 2013/06/21
- Re: Omitted rests should not collide with anything, Eluze, 2013/06/22
- Re: Omitted rests should not collide with anything,
David Kastrup <=
- Re: Omitted rests should not collide with anything, Pavel Roskin, 2013/06/22
- Re: Omitted rests should not collide with anything, Janek Warchoł, 2013/06/22
- Re: Omitted rests should not collide with anything, Pavel Roskin, 2013/06/22
- Re: Omitted rests should not collide with anything, Janek Warchoł, 2013/06/22
- Re: Omitted rests should not collide with anything, Pavel Roskin, 2013/06/22
- Re: Omitted rests should not collide with anything, Janek Warchoł, 2013/06/22
- Re: Omitted rests should not collide with anything, Pavel Roskin, 2013/06/22