bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Two possible bugs when dealing with Automatic note splitting


From: David Kastrup
Subject: Re: Two possible bugs when dealing with Automatic note splitting
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 19:12:37 +0200
User-agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux)

David Kastrup <address@hidden> writes:

> Gilberto Agostinho <address@hidden> writes:
>
>>
>> I think I found two possible bugs when dealing with Automatic note
>> splitting.
>>
>> 1) when a note has an accidental and it has to be split, the ligaturas look
>> out of place.
>>
>> 2) when a note has an accidental (regular accidental, or forced accidental
>> with an !, or even due to *dodecaphonic style*) and it has to be split,
>> these accidentals appear in all repeated notes.
>
>
>> So are these bugs or am I misusing the rhythm splitting?
>
> Bugs.  Regressions.  In 2.16.0, everything looks fine except for the
> repeated forced accidentals (those have always been overlooked, I
> guess).
>
> Bug squad, can you file the original report and the examples?  And can
> people who have some version of 2.17 installed narrow this in some more?
> I don't really fancy bisecting all the way from 2.16.

Huh.  git log -p lily/completion-note-heads-engraver.cc turns up the
following as the first non-trivial suspect:

commit 49e8c80e3282cefff91ad1b5aaff5d91b443ba5e
Author: Benkő Pál <address@hidden>
Date:   Sat Apr 14 10:21:02 2012 +0200

    Issue 2470: introduce completionUnit
    
    enable Completion_heads_engraver to work in sub-bar units

Except that this commit definitely is already included in 2.16.0.  So it
must be something else that interferes here.  Interesting.

-- 
David Kastrup




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]