bug-lilypond
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Bagpipe docs


From: Sven Axelsson
Subject: Re: Bagpipe docs
Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2013 14:35:48 +0200

On 15 October 2013 13:48, Ralph Palmer <address@hidden> wrote:

> On Mon, Oct 7, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Noeck <address@hidden> wrote:
>
> > in this section of the manual (2.16 as well as 2.17):
> > http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.16/Documentation/notation/bagpipes
> > the first mentioned advantage of bagpipe.ly is that \taor is short for
> > \grace { \small G32[ d G e] }
> >
> > But this line is no valid syntax without bagpipe.ly (due to the G).
> >
> > The meaning of pitches with bagpipe.ly should be explained before, not
> > afterwards. (A more minimal correction would be to change this line to
> > usual
> > lilypond syntax using , and ' .)
> >
> > In addition, the commands of ly/bagpipe.ly should be explained, at least
> > on
> > of each type. Right now, the user needs to read bagpipe.ly to know the
> > commands.
>
>
> Thanks, Noeck. This has been submitted as Issue 3614 :
> https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3614


The issue has been merged with 3605
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3605

I have included the source for a cheat sheet that shows all available
notations. Maybe that could be included in the documentation, suitably
reformatted?

-- 
Sven Axelsson
++++++++++[>++++++++++>+++++++++++>++++++++++>++++++
>++++<<<<<-]>++++.+.++++.>+++++.>+.<<-.>>+.>++++.<<.
+++.>-.<<++.>>----.<++.>>>++++++.<<<<.>>++++.<----.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]