[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Lilypond Website Work
From: |
Federico Bruni |
Subject: |
Re: Lilypond Website Work |
Date: |
Sun, 8 Dec 2013 23:23:13 +0100 |
2013/12/6 Federico Bruni <address@hidden>
> These problems should be recorded in our tracker.
> So far I've seen 2 issues/feature requests:
>
> 1. improve SEO
> 2. associate a different color scheme to each manual
>
>
I've added them:
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3714
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=3715
This is the list of issues when searching "website" in our tracker:
> http://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/list?can=2&q=website
> &colspec=ID+Type+Status+Stars+Owner+Patch+Needs+Summary&x=type&cells=tiles
>
> A label:Website may be useful?
>
No, label is not what we need. We might need a new Type.
Or we can keep using type:Documentation and add website: on the subject of
the issue.
Who wants to work on the website should find all the relevant issues with
these keywords:
website type:Documentation