Re: why are all engravers quoted?

[Eluze]

David Kastrup wrote
> Eluze <

> eluzew@

> > writes:
> 
>> my hiliter doesn't support hiliting keywords in quotes (or I don't know
>> how
>> to specify it)
>>
>> what's the risk of using the unquoted form: 
>>
>>   \remove Bar_engraver
>>
>> instead of
>>
>>   \remove "Bar_engraver"
> 
> The CG
> <URL:http://lilypond.org/doc/v2.19/Documentation/contributor/lilypond-formatting>
> states:
> 
>     All engravers should have double-quotes around them:
> 
>         \consists "Spans_arpeggio_engraver"
> 
>     LilyPond does not strictly require this, but it is a useful
>     convention to follow.
> 
> Apart from the bad engraver name here (it's Span_arpeggio_engraver),
> this advice is rather old. Should that make a difference?  No idea.

so nothing withstands using the unquoted form - and the (missing) hiliting
would instantly reveal the bad engraver name.

thanks for these clarifying quotes!

Eluze



--
View this message in context: 
http://lilypond.1069038.n5.nabble.com/why-are-all-engravers-quoted-tp159602p159618.html
Sent from the Bugs mailing list archive at Nabble.com.