Re: accidentalStyle dodecaphonic-no-repeat

[Urs Liska]

Am 05.07.2014 15:50, schrieb Jean-Charles Malahieude:
> Hi all,
>
> On my way in updating translations, I notice that this style seems to 
> not do what it claims.
>
> Look at the two successive examples in NR-1.1.3 Automatic accidentals, 
> both styles dodecaphonic and dodecaphonic-no-repeat: there is no 
> difference at all.

That's right, this is a bug, and I will look into it. I'm not on the 
right PC to check right now, but I strongly assume it's an issue with 
the doc example and not with the accidental style.

Urs

> Cheers,
> Jean-Charles
>
> _______________________________________________
> bug-lilypond mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-lilypond