Re: Skipping reminder accidentals in q

[James]

On 13/07/14 11:49, David Kastrup wrote:
> Helge Kruse <address@hidden> writes:
>
>> Am 13.07.2014 11:57, schrieb David Kastrup:
>>
>>>     <fis a d fis>4<f! a d f!>  <f a d f>  q
>>> Well, just write the latter version.
>> Well. this means "don't use q when you have accidentals in a chord".
> Reminder or forced accidentals, it would appear.
>
>> My example has a fourth chord. Without it the latter version doesn't
>> have any q.
>>
>>> It appears I have
>>> mentioned this when entering issue 3593 as having _also_ been discussed,
>>> illustrating how important the bug squad is for not letting reports get
>>> dropped silently.
>>>
>> So is this considered as a bug? Since #3593 is closed it should be
>> recorded as a new bug?
> With q, it is more of an enhancement request.  With
> Completion_heads_engraver, it is more of a bug than a limitation because
> you cannot really work around it.
>
> Both are separate requests concerning separate code.
>
I am just not really understanding what technically these are as the
thread talks about 'note splitting' and the like and this thread talks
about repeated chords/notes using 'q'.

So if you could give me some appropriate tracker titles, I can hunt down
the relevant threads and create the trackers more quickly.

Thanks

James