[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: implicitTimeSignatureVisibility
From: |
Ralph Palmer |
Subject: |
Re: implicitTimeSignatureVisibility |
Date: |
Fri, 3 Oct 2014 09:37:06 -0400 |
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 8:32 PM, Dan Eble <address@hidden>
wrote:
> >I'm not top posting.
> % I'm not sure if this is a defect in functionality, nomenclature,
> % documentation, or all three.
> %
> % It is not clear what is "implicit" about
> % "implicitTimeSignatureVisibility", since it has the same effect
> % whether the time signature is omitted or specified.
> %
> % The notation reference says that "implicitTimeSignatureVisibility"
> % is "break visibility for the default time signature", yet it has the
> % same effect whether the time signature is the default 4/4 or
> % something else.
> %
> % What it does appear to do is control the visibility of the first
> % time signature.
> \version "2.19.14"
>
> \score {
> \relative { c'1^"Default, Implicit (Visible)" }
> }
>
> \score {
> \relative {
> \set Score.implicitTimeSignatureVisibility = #all-invisible
> c'1^"Default, Implicit"
> }
> }
>
> \score {
> \relative {
> \set Score.implicitTimeSignatureVisibility = #all-invisible
> \time 4/4 c'1^"Default, Explicit"
> }
> }
>
> \score {
> \relative {
> \set Score.implicitTimeSignatureVisibility = #all-invisible
> \time 3/4 c'2.^"Non-default, Explicit"
> }
> }
>
Greetings - this has been submitted as Issue 4151 :
https://code.google.com/p/lilypond/issues/detail?id=4151
Ralph
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Re: implicitTimeSignatureVisibility,
Ralph Palmer <=